点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
美议员履历造假面临辞职呼声 议长强势护短：很多人这样******
中新网1月12日电 综合报道，美国国会共和党众议员乔治•桑托斯履历造假丑闻不断发酵，不仅民主党议员要求对其展开调查，就连共和党内也有人要求其辞职，称其是“彻头彻尾的骗子”。美国三号人物、新当选的众议院议长麦卡锡终于打破沉默，强势回应这一党内丑闻，但他的态度却令人意想不到……
资料图：桑托斯。“彻头彻尾的骗子！”“辞职！”
来自纽约州的众议员桑托斯近日深陷造假丑闻，他已经承认捏造了教育背景、工作经历等关键细节。桑托斯却认为，“美化”简历并不会影响他当好国会众议员。
但是，国会众议院不少议员都对其表达了不满，有民主党人摩拳擦掌要对其展开调查，甚至他的共和党同僚也呼吁他辞职。
10日，两名民主党议员向众院道德委员会递交了一份针对他的道德投诉，称其未能及时、准确、完整地提交财务披露报告，敦促委员会对此展开调查。
11日，纽约州纳苏县的共和党主席开罗在与其他共和党官员举行的新闻发布会上说：“乔治·桑托斯去年的竞选活动充满了欺骗、谎言和捏造。”
开罗指责桑托斯让众议院蒙羞，并明确表示，共和党总部不欢迎这位新任国会议员。他表示：“我们不认为他属于国会。”
开罗提及了桑托斯的各种虚假声明，包括他此前声称拥有犹太血统。开罗还告诉记者，桑托斯呈给当地共和党一份假简历，其中也充斥着谎言，包括说他是巴鲁克学院的排球队“明星”，率领他的球队获得了“联赛冠军”。
其他纽约共和党地方官员也加入了呼吁桑托斯下台的行列。纳苏县县长布莱克曼称他是一个“彻头彻尾的骗子”。
来自纽约州的国会共和党人德埃斯波西托毫不留情地提出：“桑托斯没有能力在众议院任职，他应该辞职。”
然而，在这场新闻发布会后，桑托斯明确告诉记者，他不会辞职。
资料图：麦卡锡。“很多人这样美化简历”“他有罪吗？”
共和党人麦卡锡刚经历多日僵局和长达15轮的投票，向党内反对者作出很大让步，才坐上众议院议长的位置。椅子还没捂热，桑托斯的丑闻就不断发酵，逼得他不得不站出来表态。
麦卡锡沉默了数日后终于在11日就此事发声，他的回应十分强势，但却有些“护短”，因为他拒绝向桑托斯施压迫使其辞职。
麦卡锡对记者说，“我努力遵守宪法办事。选民选他当议员。如果有顾虑，他必须通过道德委员会的审查，让他先走这个程序。”他还说道，“他将继续在众议院工作。”
据悉，国会议员一般只有在被定罪后才离任。麦卡锡说，“对他(桑托斯)的指控是什么？在今天的美国，在被证明有罪之前，那个人就是无辜的。”他还说：“如果有什么可以证明他(桑托斯)确实做错了事，那么，我们会在那个时候再处理。”
当被问及桑托斯承认自己简历造假时，麦卡锡却说：“众议院、参议院和其他地方的很多人都是这样做的。”
不过，麦卡锡也表示，桑托斯不会被分配到拨款委员会、筹款委员会、金融服务委员会以及能源和商务委员会等重要的委员会，但他并不排除桑托斯在其他委员会任职的可能性。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)